Testimony: Board of Trade supports DMVMoves Task Force recommendations to secure sustainable funding for regional transit

Testimony: Board of Trade supports DMVMoves Task Force recommendations to secure sustainable funding for regional transit

About this Testimony: 

Jack McDougle, President & CEO of the Board of Trade, speaking as Chair of the Community Partners Advisory Group, delivered strong support for the DMVMoves Task Force’s draft recommendations to secure sustainable funding and regional coordination for transit across the Greater Washington area. New capital funding would generate $460 million annually in dedicated, bondable capital for Metro beginning FY2028, addressing long-standing funding gaps to keep the system safe and modern. Furthering modernization and financial stability for Metro is important for growing our economy and workforce to meet the future needs of this region.

Video of Testimony: 

Written Testimony Submitted: 

Dear members of the DMVMoves Task Force, 

Thank you for your leadership and tremendous work that has gone into this process. I’d also like to thank my fellow advisory committee chair, Bryan Hill; the members of both advisory committees; and Clark Mercer and his team at COG, especially Kanti and Monica—for guiding this effort. And thank you as well to Nick Donohue for his thoughtful leadership, technical expertise, and steady facilitation. 

I want to recognize WMATA — General Manager Randy Clarke, his leadership team, and especially Tom Webster — for their responsiveness and for the significant progress they have delivered. Being named APTA’s Transit Agency of the Year reflects real improvement in safety, reliability, and customer experience. Without that progress, we would be having a very different conversation today. 

I’m Jack McDougle, President and CEO of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, and it’s been a privilege to chair the Community Partners Advisory Group. Our committee brought together business, labor, community advocates, and nonprofit leaders. We debated tough issues, and while we didn’t agree on every priority, we reached meaningful consensus around the need for integrated, reliable, and sustainably funded transit across the region. 

This effort is especially urgent as the federal government restructures and disruptive technologies accelerate. Our region must be able to compete for talent, investment, and innovation in a rapidly changing economy. 

If we can’t move people, we can’t move opportunity. That’s why the recommendations before you matter. They provide $460 million per year in new, bondable capital beginning in FY2028—growing three percent annually—to keep Metro safe, modern, and efficient. Securing durable, dedicated capital funding is something this region has struggled to achieve for decades, and reaching consensus on this framework is a milestone worth celebrating. 

The recommendations also set a path to align our 14 transit providers into a seamless regional network—fare policies, service guidelines, training, and priority investments. That’s how we move from a collection of systems to a coordinated platform that supports riders and drives economic growth. 

We’ve heard thoughtful feedback urging us to go further. Continued work on dedicated operating funding, stronger bus-priority implementation, accountability for delivery, workforce transition strategies, and regional studies of tools like congestion pricing and land value capture are all important next-phase conversations. Nothing in these recommendations precludes that work. In fact, they create the structure required to do it responsibly. 

But we must act now. The upcoming legislative sessions present a narrow window to secure long-term stability. If we allow the perfect to become the enemy of the good, we risk losing momentum, weakening public confidence, and slowing economic recovery. Not supporting these recommendations would take us a step backward and push us farther from the work many want to pursue next. 

From the business community’s perspective, this is about competitiveness and quality of life. Metro and our local transit systems support over $25 billion in annual economic activity, connect nearly a million daily trips, and underpin our ability to attract and retain talent and capital. Failing to act would cost far more—in congestion, lost productivity, and diminished trust in our region’s future. 

This plan is not the end of the journey; it is a beginning. We strongly support continuing a community advisory body as COG leads this next phase, with clear milestones, transparent reporting, and regional accountability. That is how we convert recommendations into results. 

Greater Washington has the assets, the talent, and the vision. Now we need the resolve. Let’s move forward together—because when our region moves, our economy moves, and our people thrive. 

Thank you, 

Jack McDougle 

President & CEO 

Greater Washington Board of Trade 

Statement on a Potential Federal Government Shutdown

Below is a statement from our President & CEO, Jack McDougle, on the potential federal government shutdown. The shutdown would significantly impact families, communities, and businesses in the Greater Washington region. 

Statement:

“A federal government shutdown would be damaging, especially now. It would hit contractors, small businesses, and service providers first and ripple through paychecks and operations across hospitality, public safety, healthcare, transportation, research, housing, and retail, undercutting confidence and slowing the region’s momentum at a critical time.

The federal enterprise must modernize to compete in a changing global economy: digitize services and operations, streamline procurement, right-size facilities and programs, and strengthen accountability and outcomes. But shutting the government down is not reform. It is costly, avoidable, and counterproductive.

Any continuing resolution is only a stopgap. Differences should be resolved in advance through regular order and timely appropriations, not brinkmanship. Congress and the Administration must finalize a bipartisan funding agreement now to give employers and families the predictability they need, then pursue negotiations through a normal, transparent budget process that improves outcomes without risking paychecks or public services.”

Jack McDougle, President & CEO

Board of Trade Logo

About the Greater Washington Board of Trade

The Greater Washington Board of Trade, founded in 1889, is the region’s premier non-partisan business organization representing industry, nonprofits, universities, and government agencies. The Board of Trade addresses complex and always-evolving business concerns that stretch across the District of Columbia, suburban Maryland, and Northern Virginia, with a priority focus on inclusive economic growth, improving the business climate, and enhancing the region’s economic competitiveness. Learn more about the Board of Trade and its mission at www.boardoftrade.org.

More from the Greater Washington Board of Trade: 

Check out our latest Newsletter sharing regional business news in our region: https://bit.ly/4n9inkc

Check out our latest Legislative Update sharing polices and pieces of legislation impacting our region: https://bit.ly/4mJcZ75

Building Momentum for RFK Stadium Redevelopment Project

The future of RFK Stadium is moving closer to reality after September 17, when D.C. Council voted again in favor of the RFK stadium redevelopment legislation. Redeveloping RFK is not just about building a stadium; it’s about creating a 21st-century destination that reflects the values and ambitions of the District and its residents. The Board of Trade is proud to be a leading voice in shaping that future, and we will remain engaged as the process advances.  (Statement: D.C. Council final vote for redevelopment funding on Sept. 17)

This project represents more than bricks and mortar; it is a chance to reshape an iconic site into a destination that drives economic growth, improves connectivity, and enhances the quality of life across the District and region. The project will create 14,000 construction jobs and 2,000 permanent jobs, generating $4 billion in tax revenue and more than $15.6 billion in direct spending over 30 years. Spanning about 180 acres of the former RFK Stadium site, the campus will transform today’s underused riverfront parcel into a vibrant mixed-use neighborhood.

 

This RFK Stadium stie redesign rendering is provided by KATO. See more here: https://www.rfknewstadium.com/

 

Earlier this year, the Board of Trade, city officials, and other local and regional groups testified before the D.C. Council in support of legislation that would unlock the potential of the RFK site and allow the city to move forward with a transformative vision, including: 

  • Letters of support were submitted to the D.C. Council outlining the opportunity to transform the District through a 65,000-seat roofed stadium for the Washington Commanders, designed to host not only football but also up to 200 annual events, including concerts and cultural gatherings.
  • In initial testimony before the D.C. Council, the case was made for legislation to unlock the potential of the RFK site and advance a broader vision for redevelopment. The testimony highlighted priorities such as strong transit connections, economic competitiveness, and community benefits. Specific elements included 6,000 new housing units (with at least 30% affordable), hotel rooms, new restaurants and retail, parking, an $89 million youth sportsplex, activation of the Fields at RFK, expanded green space, riverfront access, and walkable parks. (read our testimony here 
  • Subsequent testimony supported the RFK Stadium funding bill and underscored the importance of timely action to prioritize infrastructure, affordable housing, and adherence to construction timelines. (read our second testimony here) 
  • In addition, Mayor Bowser and community leaders convened engagement events, including a rally at the Wilson Building and a stakeholder event hosted by the Mayor, to highlight the redevelopment’s potential business opportunities. These gatherings drew attention to the broad community and economic impacts of this once-in-a-generation project.

Throughout the entire process, we have been in ongoing dialogue with the Washington Commanders to ensure that the project balances economic competitiveness with community needs — from workforce opportunities to improved transit access and mixed-use development that serves residents and businesses alike. With upgraded utilities, new roadways, improved transit access, and vibrant hospitality districts like the Riverfront and Plaza, the project will revitalize the site and surrounding neighborhoods. It will serve as a community anchor by blending housing, commerce, recreation, and entertainment into a powerful driver of growth for the District.

The Board of Trade will continue to champion this redevelopment as an engine of growth, connectivity, and opportunity for the entire region. We look forward to continuing conversations with the Commanders, community leaders, and stakeholders to unlock all that the RFK site has to offer.  

Learn more about how we engage with leaders at the federal, state, and local levels to ensure that the voices of Greater Washington’s business community are heard: https://www.bot.org/business-policy-greater-washington-dc/

Statement: Board of Trade on President’s Announcement to Deploy National Guard Troops in Washington, DC

“The Greater Washington Board of Trade shares the priority of keeping our communities safe and ensuring that people and businesses can thrive without disruption. Public safety is the foundation of a strong economy and quality of life.

In recent years, the District has made meaningful progress in reducing crime, with violent crime and property crime now at some of the lowest levels in recent memory. These gains are the result of sustained efforts by city leadership, law enforcement, business leaders, community organizations, and residents working together.

We welcome continued federal cooperation and coordination to build on this success. However, the National Guard’s mission is not law enforcement, and the deployment of troops for this purpose is likely unnecessary. We encourage federal leaders to work closely with District officials to support proven, community-based strategies that enhance safety while respecting the rights and trust of all residents.

The Board of Trade remains committed to fostering a safe, resilient, and inclusive Capital Region for all who live, work, and visit here.”

ABOUT THE BOARD OF TRADE

The Greater Washington Board of Trade, founded in 1889, is the region’s premier non-partisan business organization representing industry, nonprofits, universities, and government agencies. The Board of Trade addresses complex and always-evolving business concerns that stretch across the District of Columbia, suburban Maryland and Northern Virginia, with a priority focus on inclusive economic growth, improving the business climate, and enhancing the region’s economic competitiveness.  

READ MORE POLICY ISSUES AND TOPICS THE BOARD OF TRADE IS FOLLOWING

Testimony to DC Council: Board of Trade Supports Bill for RFK Site Redevelopment

Update: The Washington Commanders secured a major milestone in the effort to bring professional football back to the District. On August 1st, the D.C. Council voted 9–3 in favor of legislation that would pave the way for the redevelopment of the RFK Stadium site, thus marking a pivotal first step in transforming one of the city’s most iconic but long-dormant properties into a vibrant, multi-use destination. This vote signals renewed momentum for a project that has implications far beyond the stadium walls. At its core, the redevelopment of the RFK site represents a commitment to regionalism with an investment in shared assets that generate economic activity, draw visitors, and enhance quality of life across jurisdictional lines.

About this Testimony:

The Board of Trade testified a second time before the D.C. Council and sent a letter to Council Chairman Phil Mendelson in support of Mayor Muriel Bowser’s proposal to bring the Washington Commanders back to the District as part of a larger mixed-use redevelopment of the RFK site. We again highlighted the opportunity not just as a sports project, but as a catalyst for long-term economic growth, fiscal strength, and regional competitiveness.

Previous Testimony on RFK Site Redevelopment to D.C. Council

Testimony Recording from DC Council Meeting: 

Letter to Chairman Mendelson:

Good Morning, Chairman Mendelson and members of the Council. 

Thank you for the opportunity to speak on behalf of the Greater Washington Board of Trade. Founded in 1889, our nonpartisan organization represents hundreds of employers across the Greater Washington region—spanning industry, nonprofits, universities, and government agencies. We’re committed to advancing inclusive economic growth and strengthening the city’s competitive position. 

My name is Daniel Flores, and I’m here to express our strong support for the Mayor’s proposal to bring the Washington Commanders back to the District through a new stadium and mixed use development at the old RFK stadium site. This moment is about far more than building a stadium—it’s about unlocking the full potential of a high-impact site to become a bold, mixed-use destination that embodies the future of urban development. With smart, forward-looking planning, this space can be transformed into a thriving hub for housing, small businesses, transit, recreation, and cultural activity.  

As the District stands at a critical crossroads, we must pursue ambitious solutions that don’t just maintain the status quo but reshape it. This is a once-in-a-generation opportunity to catalyze long-term prosperity, create new jobs, and strengthen our city’s position as a vibrant, resilient, and equitable capital for decades to come. With a record $2.7 billion private investment—the largest in D.C.’s history—augmented by thoughtfully designed public infrastructure, this project can: 

  • Support over 30,000 jobs and generate $4 billion in new tax revenue and unlock billions more in direct spending.  
  • Revitalize the RFK campus with new housing including 5,000-6,000 new homes for more than 10,000 residents across the campus with at least 30% affordable, maintaining The Fields at RFK and investing $89 million to construct a new state-of-the-art youth sports complex, new parks, retail, recreation, hospitality, and more.  
  • Generate long-term economic diversification through the develop of an inclusive, vibrant neighborhood that serves expanded opportunities for residents, supports small businesses, and boosts regional tourism.  

We recognize the District faces fiscal constraints. That’s precisely why this investment is critical—it leverages private capital to grow the tax base and secure the city’s long-term financial stability, and we have seen the successful transformative power of these kind of investments before. While we have seen several successful projects around the city, including the redevelopments of Nationals Park, Audi Field, and The Wharf—we believe the RFK project has the ability to surpass many of these incredibly successful projects we have already seen throughout the city.  

Time, however, is not on our side. Delays in legislative action or infrastructure investment threaten to derail the project timeline. Missing critical benchmarks this year could push back the stadium’s opening beyond the 2030 NFL season—and with that delay, the District could forfeit an estimated $750 million in lost economic impact from major events like the 2031 FIFA Women’s World Cup, the Rugby World Cup, a full season of Commanders home games, and large-scale concerts. This is more than an opportunity cost—it’s a concrete loss to city revenues, jobs, and visibility on the global stage. Additionally, failing to act could invite the opportunity for federal action to interfere with this redevelopment as it can be a signature achievement for the District—one that honors its past, serves its people, and inspires confidence in its future. 

Let’s be clear: this is more than a stadium project. It’s a transformative vision for over 190 acres of largely dormant land in the heart of our capital city. It’s a chance to create an inclusive, vibrant neighborhood that reflects D.C.’s values and positions us as a national leader in urban renewal.  

On behalf of the Board of Trade, I urge the Council to act with urgency and conviction. The pieces are in place and now is the moment to move forward to deliver not just 190 acres of largely dormant land in the core of the district, but a project that will shape the city’s future for generations to come. 

Thank you for your time, and for your leadership on this critical issue. 

Sincerely, 

Jack McDougle

President & CEO

Greater Washington Board of Trade

Letter of Support for Proposed I-495 Southside Express Lanes Project

About this Letter of Support:

In a June 26 letter to the Transportation Planning Board, the Greater Washington Board of Trade expressed strong support for the proposed I-495 Southside Express Lanes project, citing its potential to ease congestion, support transit, and strengthen regional competitiveness. The letter highlights the project’s preservation of free lanes, addition of high-occupancy toll lanes, and integration of multimodal infrastructure including express bus service, biking, and pedestrian access. It also emphasizes the importance of maintaining right-of-way for future Metrorail expansion and notes that the project delivers critical improvements without new taxes. The Board urged VDOT to move forward, calling the investment essential for economic resilience and mobility in Greater Washington.

Letter of Support:

Chair James Walkinshaw, 

On behalf of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, I write to express strong support for the proposed I-495 Southside Express Lanes project, now under review through the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process. 

Founded in 1889, the Board of Trade is the region’s leading non-partisan business organization, representing a broad cross-section of industries, nonprofits, universities, and government agencies across D.C., suburban Maryland, and Northern Virginia. We focus on inclusive economic growth, a competitive business climate, and strategic investments in transportation and infrastructure that drive regional vitality and quality of life. That’s why we support proposals like the new express lanes from Springfield across the Woodrow Wilson Bridge to I-295 — a forward-thinking, multimodal solution to one of our region’s most critical transportation challenges. 

This project will benefit all who live, work, and travel in the corridor. It preserves the existing free lanes while adding high-occupancy toll lanes that are free for transit and carpoolers. It also includes critical investments in transit, biking, and pedestrian access. Notably, it preserves the right-of-way for future Metrorail expansion across the Woodrow Wilson Bridge and provides immediate funding for express bus service to build ridership and strengthen future demand. 

Most importantly, this solution balances the urgent need for mobility improvements with long-term environmental and equity considerations. Without action, travel times on this segment of the Beltway are projected to double in the coming decades — worsening access to jobs, increasing emissions, and undermining the region’s economic resilience. 

This project unlocks billions of dollars in transportation infrastructure investment without raising taxes or diverting funding from other critical regional needs. For our region to remain competitive and connected in a fast-changing economy, that kind of infrastructure investment is not just welcome — it’s essential. 

We urge the Virginia Department of Transportation to move forward with the I-495 Southside Express Lanes project and to continue engaging stakeholders throughout implementation. The Board of Trade stands ready to support this effort and work collaboratively with our public and private partners to ensure a more connected, competitive, and sustainable region. 

Sincerely, 

Jack McDougle 

President & CEO 

Greater Washington Board of Trade 

Testimony to DC Council in Support of RFK Stadium Funding Bill

Update: The Washington Commanders secured a major milestone in the effort to bring professional football back to the District. On August 1st, the D.C. Council voted 9–3 in favor of legislation that would pave the way for the redevelopment of the RFK Stadium site, thus marking a pivotal first step in transforming one of the city’s most iconic but long-dormant properties into a vibrant, multi-use destination. This vote signals renewed momentum for a project that has implications far beyond the stadium walls. At its core, the redevelopment of the RFK site represents a commitment to regionalism with an investment in shared assets that generate economic activity, draw visitors, and enhance quality of life across jurisdictional lines.

About this Testimony:

The Board of Trade testified before the D.C. Council and sent a letter to Council Chairman Phil Mendelson in support of Mayor Muriel Bowser’s proposal to bring the Washington Commanders back to the District as part of a larger mixed-use redevelopment of the RFK site. We highlighted the opportunity not just as a sports project, but as a catalyst for long-term economic growth, fiscal strength, and regional competitiveness.

Testimony Recording from DC Council Meeting: 

Letter to Chairman Mendelson:

Dear Chairman Mendelson, 

Thank you for the opportunity to share the perspectives of the Greater Washington Board of Trade. We strongly support the mayor’s proposal to bring the Washington Commanders back to the District through a new stadium and mixed-use development at the RFK site, and we urge the Council to take the legislative and budget actions needed to move this project forward. Revitalizing the RFK campus is a rare opportunity to deliver lasting economic, social, and community benefits—not just for the District, but for the entire region. 

With a $2.7 billion private investment—the largest in the city’s history—paired with essential public infrastructure, this project will support tens of thousands of jobs, generate billions in new tax revenue, and transform one of the city’s most underutilized properties. The broader vision—including housing, retail, parks, and recreational space—will help create a vibrant, inclusive neighborhood that serves residents and draws visitors. 

We recognize the District faces significant fiscal challenges, and public investments must be made wisely. That’s precisely why this project matters. Strategic developments that unlock private capital and grow the tax base are critical to the city’s long-term financial health. 

We also acknowledge concerns about land use, community access, and stewardship of the site. These are important and valid. With thoughtful planning and strong accountability, this project can reflect community values while advancing shared goals. 

Key milestones must be met in the coming months to stay on track for a 2030 opening, including legislative approval, infrastructure funding, and lease finalization. Delays now could jeopardize the entire opportunity. 

We urge the Council to act with urgency and confidence. This is a once-in-a-generation chance to shape the future of the RFK site and deliver real value for the city. Let’s not miss it. 

Sincerely, 

Jack McDougle

President & CEO

Greater Washington Board of Trade

Letter to WMATA and WMSC Boards Urging Dispute Resolution Process for Safety Technology Adoption

Update: Following our letter to the WMATA and WMSC Boards, we’re pleased to see ATO formally approved for the Green and Yellow lines, a major step forward for safer, more efficient transit.

About This Letter of Officials: In this letter to the WMATA and WMSC Boards, the Greater Washington Board of Trade urges the establishment of a formal process for resolving disputes over proven transit safety technologies, citing the years-long delay in approving Automatic Train Operation. The letter highlights the risks this poses to Metro performance, regional mobility, and the economic competitiveness of Greater Washington.

Dear Chair Hart and Chair Santos,

The recent decision by the Washington Metrorail Safety Commission (WMSC) to
approve Automatic Train Operation (ATO) on the Green and Yellow Metrorail lines is a
welcome and long-overdue step forward for our region. It’s a meaningful move toward
enhancing safety while restoring the speed, reliability, and consistency riders expect—
along with greater capacity and long-term cost savings for the system.

As Metro regains ridership and reconnects communities, modern tools like ATO are
essential. Riders depend on Metro to get to work, access essential services, and
participate fully in our economy. Expanding ATO will save time, improve the rider
experience, reduce operator fatigue, and enhance safety—benefits already
demonstrated on the Red Line. It also sends a strong signal to companies already
here—and those looking to invest—that Greater Washington is committed to modern,
efficient infrastructure that supports business growth and workforce mobility.

The long delay in approving ATO highlighted a deeper challenge: WMATA and WMSC
lack a clear process for resolving differences over proven safety technologies and other
issues. There’s no appeals pathway, no neutral third party, and no structured way to
quickly move forward when views diverge. That creates gridlock—and undermines
progress.

From a business standpoint, this kind of misalignment poses real risk. Metro is not just a
transit system—it’s essential for a competitive regional economy. It drives commerce,
lifts property values, and connects people to jobs, education, and opportunity. As the
federal government continues to evolve and decentralize, we need Metro to operate at
its full potential to attract talent, support innovation, and realize our economic promise.
In a world defined by speed, data, and disruption, delays in adopting safe, widely used
technologies don’t just slow trains—they slow the entire region.

It’s time for a fix. I call on the WMATA and WMSC Boards to establish a formal process
for resolving disputes—one that includes third-party mediation when needed, public
reporting of decisions, and a commitment to timely, evidence-based outcomes. The
DMV Moves initiative has already shown what’s possible when our regional bodies work
together with purpose.

If no progress is made by year’s end, the Greater Washington Board of Trade will
encourage leaders in the District, Maryland, and Virginia to amend the WMSC Compact
to require such a process. Many elected officials have already expressed concern about
the lack of coordination and transparency that marked the ATO decision.

We should not have to rely on legislative action. A shared commitment to better
governance—balancing strong oversight with a clear path to modernization—will move
the region forward and strengthen trust across the board.

Sincerely,

Jack McDougle
President & CEO
Greater Washington Board of Trade

Letter of Support: ‘District of Columbia Fiscal Autonomy Act’ Advancing to House Floor

About this Letter of Support: Greater Washington Board of Trade President & CEO Jack McDougle submitted a Letter of Support to the United States House of Representatives (including House Speaker Mike Johnson, and both Senate and House members that represent Greater Washignton) commending congressional leadership for advancing the District of Columbia Fiscal Autonomy Act to the House floor. This bipartisan legislation safeguards D.C.’s right to use its locally generated revenue, at no expense to the federal government. Its passage is critical to avoiding a $1.1 billion budget gap and maintaining funding for essential public services that support the District’s economic stability and the broader region’s prosperity.

Dear Mr. Speaker (Mike Johnson),

On behalf of the Greater Washington Board of Trade, I write to commend your leadership in advancing the District of Columbia Fiscal Autonomy Act to a floor vote this week. Your decision to move this legislation forward marks an important step toward restoring budget certainty and fiscal stability for our nation’s capital.

The Board of Trade has consistently advocated for the District’s ability to manage its locally raised revenues without Congressional interference. As outlined in our previous letters to Congress, we view local budget autonomy as essential to D.C.’s economic vitality, public service delivery, and long-term competitiveness as the hub of a dynamic regional economy.

We are also encouraged by the continued support of the region’s Congressional delegation, who have championed this issue on behalf of the District’s residents and businesses.

Bringing this legislation to a vote sends a strong signal about the importance of responsible governance and pragmatic leadership. Thank you for taking this step to advance a solution that promotes stability, preserves local control, and supports the broader regional economy.

Sincerely,

Jack McDougle
President & CEO
Greater Washington Board of Trade

Testimony to DC Council: Workforce Strategies Must Support Economic Growth and Resilience

About this Testimony: The Greater Washington region is at a pivotal moment when it comes to workforce development. Shifts in the federal employment landscape, combined with long-standing challenges around talent access and equitable opportunity, demand a bold, coordinated response. On behalf of the Board of Trade, President and CEO Jack McDougle delivered the following testimony to the D.C. Council’s Committee on Executive Administration and Labor. His remarks emphasize the need for a modern, regionally aligned workforce system, one that bridges gaps between employers and talent, supports economic resilience, and ensures D.C. residents and businesses can thrive in a rapidly evolving economy.

Chairperson Anita Bonds and members of the Committee,

Thank you for the opportunity to testify on behalf of the Greater Washington Board of Trade. My name is Jack McDougle, and I am President and CEO of the Board of Trade. Founded in 1889, we represent hundreds of employers—with thousands of workers— across the Washington region who rely on a skilled, adaptable, and inclusive workforce to compete—and who are committed to helping strengthen the workforce in the District and throughout the metro area. 

Workforce challenges aren’t new. This region has long been home to one of the most highly educated and skilled workforces in the country. We have some of the best universities, research institutions, and federal expertise anywhere. But employers still struggle to find the right talent at the right time. And too many residents still face barriers to getting their foot in the door. 

Now, those long-standing challenges are intersecting with something bigger and more immediate. 

The federal government—long the backbone of our regional economy—is changing. Telework, digitization, automation, and agency consolidation are reducing the federal footprint, especially in downtown D.C. That’s affecting not just jobs, but office occupancy, small business vitality, and city revenues. Thousands of workers are being displaced or restructured, many of them with valuable skills—but without a clear path forward. Meanwhile, many D.C. residents are still disconnected from the workforce entirely.  

So, we’re facing a multi-sided problem: how to help people enter the workforce, how to help experienced professionals transition into new roles and how to attract and retain the talent we need to compete. 

Solving this isn’t just about creating more training programs. It’s about building a coordinated, regional system that connects people to opportunity—wherever the job is—and helps employers find talent—wherever that talent lives. 

Why a Regional Approach Matters 

The District lies at the economic center of a much larger labor market. Roughly two-thirds of jobs in D.C. are held by people who live in Maryland or Virginia. At the same time, tens of thousands of District residents commute to jobs outside the city every day. 

If we’re serious about increasing economic opportunity for D.C. residents, we can’t limit our thinking to only jobs within city limits. Likewise, if we want to strengthen D.C.’s job base and bring people back into our downtown corridors, we need to make it easier for talent across the region to access those jobs. 

This requires a level of policy alignment, data sharing, and joint investment that we simply do not have today. 

Some progress is underway. Virginia’s G3 program, for example, offers tuition-free community college in high-demand fields like IT, healthcare, and skilled trades—paired with employer engagement. Maryland is investing in apprenticeship expansion and industry-led partnerships through its Employment Advancement Right Now (EARN) initiative. 

Virginia has also taken steps to streamline its workforce system by consolidating dozens of fragmented programs under the purview of the newly established Virginia Office of Education and Labor, with the goal of improving coordination, reducing duplication, and aligning training more directly with employer needs. 

And in D.C., we’re seeing promising models too—like the Infrastructure Academy’s partnerships with Pepco and WMATA to prepare residents for real jobs in energy and transportation. But we need more coordination across the region, and better data to guide investment. 

What the Council Can Do 

Here are five ways the District can lead in FY26—and help build a workforce system that reflects how people live, work, and move across this region. 

  1. Support a Regional, Data-Driven Workforce Strategy
    Our region lacks a shared, real-time understanding of workforce supply and demand. Employers, educators, training providers, and governments all make decisions based on partial or outdated information. We strongly urge the District to partner with neighboring jurisdictions—Maryland, Virginia, and regional planning bodies—to develop a unified baseline of current labor market conditions. This should include disaggregated data by industry, occupation, skills, demographics, and geography.

Such a baseline would allow all of us to align efforts, avoid duplication, target investment, and measure progress consistently. 

Recommendation: 
Support the creation of a Regional Workforce Intelligence Hub, in partnership with MWCOG, Consortium of Universities, the Workforce Investment Council, and workforce leaders in Maryland and Virginia. 

  • Helps align training programs with actual job demand 
  • Track skill gaps and mobility across jurisdictions 
  • Provides clear, actionable data for jobseekers, employers, and policymakers alike 

This is core infrastructure for smarter decisions and stronger outcomes. 

  1. Expand Employer-Led Training with Cross-Jurisdiction Portability
    We need to move even further beyond traditional classroom models and embrace demand-driven, work-based learning. The Council can promote public-private partnerships that create apprenticeships, industry bootcamps, and employer-sponsored credentials—especially in high-growth sectors like IT, clean energy, healthcare, and advanced manufacturing.

Recommendation: 
Invest in Workforce Innovation Grants that support partnerships between employers and training providers focused on: 

  • Industry-designed curricula 
  • Paid apprenticeships and bootcamps 
  • Credentials recognized across D.C., Maryland, and Virginia 
  • Reducing administrative barriers for employer participation  

This builds on successful approaches already in motion. We’ve seen how employer-driven programs at UDC, the Healthcare Workforce Partnership, and the Tech Apprenticeship Program at Northern Virginia Community College can deliver talent that’s job-ready from day one. 

  1. Launch a Federal Workforce Transition Program
    Thousands of federal and contractor workers are being impacted by the ongoing restructuring. Many have transferable skills—but need targeted support to pivot into new fields.

Recommendation: 
Create an integrated Federal Transition Upskilling Program to provide: 

  • Training in high-demand private-sector fields (e.g., cybersecurity, project management, clean energy) 
  • Career coaching and job placement support 
  • Incentives for regional employers to hire transitioning talent 

This helps retain experienced professionals in the region and prevents talent loss from the city’s core. 

  1. Invest in Wraparound Supports for Jobseekers
    Access to training is meaningless if people can’t show up. We hear this all the time from employers and community partners—people are ready to work but face real barriers.

Recommendation: 
Prioritize supports that make workforce participation possible: 

  • Childcare for jobseekers and trainees 
  • Free or subsidized Metro, MARC, VRE or other mobility access 
  • Navigation and coaching services that help residents see—and pursue—what’s possible across the region 

These supports may seem small, but they’re game-changers for residents balancing work, family, and training. 

  1. Strengthen the District’s Workforce Infrastructure
    The District’s workforce system needs to be agile, integrated, and built to partner—both internally and across borders. We encourage the Council to break down silos—between workforce, education, economic development, and human services—and between the District and its regional peers. The economic fate of this region is shared. No single jurisdiction can go it alone.

Recommendation: 
Further support DOES and the Workforce Investment Council to: 

  • Modernize operations and digital tools for job matching and tracking 
  • Improve coordination across education, training, and economic development 
  • Evaluate long-term outcomes—not just short-term placements 

This ensures our systems are working smarter, not just harder. 

Conclusion: Shared Workforce, Shared Responsibility 

The workforce challenges we face—recruitment, retention, displacement, inequity, skills misalignment—don’t stop at jurisdictional borders. Our solutions can’t either. 

The District has a chance to lead—not only in reimagining how we support residents and businesses, but in showing what regional collaboration can look like when it’s done right. 

Let’s connect the dots between employers, workers, and opportunity—no matter where they’re starting from. Let’s build a workforce system that reflects how people actually live and work across the region. 

Sincerely,

Jack McDougle

President & CEO 

Greater Washington Board of Trade

See Additional Testimonies and Letters of Support we have submitted recently:

Letter of Support: ‘Local Funds Act of 2025’ Protects DC’s Authority to Spend Locally Raised Revenue

Testimony: Submitted to DC Council, Committee on Business & Economic Development

Letter to Congress: Addressing Concerns with House Concurrent Resolution 14

Congress Should Preserve DC’s Home Rule and Withdraw the Bowser Act | WBJ Viewpoint

Featured Members